Re: heads-up on planned changes in MT

>At 10:01 PM 9/28/01 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:
>>The following are true in any rdf interpretation of the rdf 
>>vocabulary (three typings and two domainings:)
>>
>>rdf:domain rdf:type rdf:Property .
>>
>>rdf:range rdf:type rdf:Property .
>
>Does this mean you are proposing to move domain and range from rdfs: 
>to rdf: namespace?

No, it means I didn't notice a typo in the MT document. Never mind.....

>(This might break a lot of deployed code.  Also, they do seem rather 
>like rdfs: rather than rdf: vocabulary to me.)

Yes, I agree, though the type/domain/range set do form a very nice 
semantic combination. But never mind, I will rewrite it.

Pat


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes

Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2001 20:16:12 UTC