- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 19:16:09 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>At 10:01 PM 9/28/01 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote: >>The following are true in any rdf interpretation of the rdf >>vocabulary (three typings and two domainings:) >> >>rdf:domain rdf:type rdf:Property . >> >>rdf:range rdf:type rdf:Property . > >Does this mean you are proposing to move domain and range from rdfs: >to rdf: namespace? No, it means I didn't notice a typo in the MT document. Never mind..... >(This might break a lot of deployed code. Also, they do seem rather >like rdfs: rather than rdf: vocabulary to me.) Yes, I agree, though the type/domain/range set do form a very nice semantic combination. But never mind, I will rewrite it. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2001 20:16:12 UTC