- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 17:38:56 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- cc: dehora <dehora@eircom.net>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>>>Dan Connolly said: > dehora wrote: <snip size="lots"/> Firstly, rdf:parseType="Literal" is staying in this RDF/XML syntax. > > Old text: Section 3.1 > > > > "6.34 literal any well-formed XML " > > > > new text: > > > > "6.34 literal any XML" > > new text: > "6.34 literal any well-formed XML content, in the > sense of the content production in the XML grammar." [6.x sections have been moved to appendix in current WD editors copy] > > > Old text: section 4.20 > > > > "4.20 Production literal (was 6.34 literal) > > Any non-empty well-formed XML." > > > > New text: > > > > "4.20 Production literal (was 6.34 literal) > > Any non-empty XML." > > new text: > > "4.20 Production literal (was 6.34 literal) > Any non-empty XML content." > > > Dave, do you agree this is a simple editorial fix? If so, > please make it (or something like it). Or do you > think it's a substantive issue that the WG should consider? I see this as an editorial change and I am going to do this. Firstly, I'm likely to merge the empty/non-empty cases and remove "non-empty". Secondly, what is allowed (implicitly) is anything that is legal for the content of an XML element, according to the XML rules, rather than just well-formed. I will replace the 4.20 words with something like that. The reference Dan pointed out (in the elided bit of the quote above) in XML section 4.3.2 Well-Formed Parsed Entities looks like something worth referencing: An internal general parsed entity is well-formed if its replacement text matches the production labeled content. [...] [43] content ::= CharData? ((element | Reference | CDSect | PI | Comment) CharData?)* -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006#wf-entities -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006#NT-content Editors draft is at http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/ I haven't yet merged this in; been working on updating the N-Triples section of http://www.w3.org/2001/08/rdf-test/ Dave
Received on Monday, 15 October 2001 12:38:59 UTC