- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 13:30:27 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Sun, 14 Oct 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote: > > RDF Schema normative > > > I'd like to make sure our RDF Schema spec is short, sweet and > easily replaceable by the specification released by the WebOnt > WG. I think the best of doing this is split out the RDF The (draft) Web Ont charter does not require them to produce a Schema language for RDF, nor is it couched in terms of 'replacement'. Dan > Schema-specific portions of the into a separate draft. As Dan > Connolly noted, this covers most of RDF Schema. We probably need > to add some simple definitions of other the RDF Schema terms > like label and comment.
Received on Sunday, 14 October 2001 13:31:37 UTC