W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:55:19 -0500
Message-Id: <p05101009b7ecfa25b338@[]>
To: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>It looks like it is still the case that RDF/XML syntax can only
>represent a subset of valid RDF graphs,

But that, I gather, is the case more generally.

>in which there are no circles
>that contain bNodes only. If so, this limitation needs to be stressed in
>the spec(s).

Agreed. There should be a whole little essay (in the primer?) about 
the different notations and the relationships between them.

>An exception handling mechanism must be specified as well.

Why? Isn't it enough that there should be round-tripping from RDF/XML 
-> graph -> RDF/XML?


IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
Received on Friday, 12 October 2001 15:55:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:05 UTC