W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: model theory state of play

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:54:09 -0500
Message-Id: <p0510100fb7e376f69b46@[]>
To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>we updated "etc" at http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/entailment/
>w.r.t http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-2.1_draft.html
>| 4. RDF-entailment and RDF closures
>rules   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/entailment/rdf-rules.n3
>seed    http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/entailment/rdf-facts.n3
>closure http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/entailment/rdf-query.n3
>| 6. RDFS-entailment and RDFS closures
>rules   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/entailment/rdf-rules.n3
>         http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/entailment/rdfs-rules.n3
>seed    http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/entailment/rdf-facts.n3
>closure http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/entailment/rdfs-query.n3


>the only thing that we couldn't proof is
>   rdfs:ConstraintProperty rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property .
>(also cwm is not producing such a triple)

Hmm. I put that in since it seems be specified by the RDFSSpec, but 
maybe I misunderstood that. It would be easy to remove this from both 
the semantics and the closure rules if people think it shouldnt be in.

>Anyhow, this "state of play" is a definite improvement Pat!

Yes, it is much better organized. I should have had reserved 
namespaces in there from the start. Einstein once said: keep things 
as simple as possible, but not too simple.


IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
Received on Friday, 5 October 2001 10:54:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:05 UTC