Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals

>(The example I use is "chat".  ((we actually had an email
>adderss for feiendly team discussion chat@w3.org and had a problem
>when Mlle Catherine Chat joined the Paris office and wanted chat@w3.org)))

Good one.

>....
>Never mind higher forms of equivalence -- if the whole language is
>built on something which has ambiguity in syntactic identity of literals,
>then  the whole thing is weak.

OK, fair enough, and I agree.

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes

Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2001 23:47:36 UTC