W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:45:54 -0500
Message-ID: <3BC5DAD2.BE8BA337@w3.org>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>, RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Brian McBride wrote:
> There seem to be no responses to Graham's proposed resolution text, and I assume
> therefore no dissent.  This will be on Friday's telecon agenda.

I agree with it, but I'm not quite sure how it relates to our
deliverables. Is it already reflected in the model theory
or one of the other drafts? Are you suggesting that this
text goes in the model theory spec?

Do we have test cases?

The meeting records are a means to an end, not
an end in themselves.

Rather than elaborate proposals like this, I'd rather see
agenda items like:

	PROPOSED: that section 4.3 of the 13 Sep syntax draft,
	along with test cases X, Y, and Z,
	adequately addresses issue BLORTZ.

> Graham Klyne wrote:
> > With respect to the issue:
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-identity-anon-resources

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2001 13:47:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:05 UTC