- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:32:08 +0100
- To: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I had a problem with my action list earlier today. Here is an updated agenda, with a new item inserted at 6 to close completed actions. Appologies for the duplication. Brian -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-19 Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:28:29 +0100 (BST) From: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com Time: 10:00:00 Fri Oct 19 2001 in America/New York which is equivalent to 15:00:00 Fri Oct 19 2001 in Europe/London 23:00:00 Fri Oct 19 2001 in Asia/Seoul Phone: +1 630 536 3003 room #3003 irc: irc.openprojects.net #rdfcore 1: Allocate scribe 2: Roll Call 3: Review Agenda 4: Next telecon - 10am Boston time, 26th October 2001 5: Review Minutes of previous meeting See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0249.html 6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions ACTION: 2001-09-21#3 Dan Connolly Place rdfs-no-cycles-in-subClassOf in proper place in directory structure (when we know where that is) ACTION: 2001-09-28#3 Jos de Roos Review test cases for cycles in subClassOf see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0362.html ACTION: 2001-09-28#4 Art Barstow Review test cases for cycles in subClassOf see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0362.html ACTION: 2001-09-28#5 Dave Beckett Fix test case errors see: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0007.nt see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0294.html ACTION: 2001-09-28#6 Jeremy Carroll Re-post problem found in test case see: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0004.html ACTION: 2001-09-28#8 Art Barstow Delete test cases containing rdf:aboutEachPrefix see: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0008.rdf see: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0008.nt ACTION: 2001-09-28#9 Art Barstow Investigate best W3 practice in deleting test cases such as leaving a blank file there so as not to break the published URI ACTION: 2001-09-28#10 Art Barstow Talk to Eric Miller and Dan Connolly to investigate how to use editors drafts and the process of updating documents ACTION: 2001-10-12#1 Pat Hayes Review domain and range test cases see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0274.html ACTION: 2001-10-12#2 Art Barstow Review domain and range test cases see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0258.html ACTION: 2001-10-12#3 Jos deRoos Change domain and range test cases to use example.org. see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0254.html ACTION: 2001-10-12#4 Graham Klyne Bring identity of anonymous resourcese back to the table for next week. see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0288.html ACTION: 2001-10-12#5 Frank Manola Respond to Graham see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0299.html ACTION: 2001-10-12#6 Jos deRoos Send interpretation properties URL to e-mail list. see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0254.html ACTION: 2001-10-12#7 Sergey Melnik Summarise rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes issue for next week see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0343.html 7: Propose approve parseType test cases See: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-parseType/ 8: Propose approve domain and range test cases 1, 2 and 3 Review status of test case 4 See: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range 9: Issue rdfms-identity-anon-resources Propose that the WG RESOLVE that the RDF model theory draft of 25 September 2001 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-rdf-mt-20010925/) adequately addresses the issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-identity-anon-resources See: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-rdf-mt-20010925/ 10: Propose approve test cases in http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-identity-anon-resources/ See: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-identity-anon-resources/ 11: Propose approve Pat's suggestion to distinguish between a blank node and its label. In future the term *node identifier* (which may be abbreviated to nodeId) should be used to refer label of a blank node in, for example n-triples. A node in the graph itself should be referred to as a blank node, which may be abbreviated to bNode. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0237.html 12: Review status of Entailment tests and Test manifest proposal. 13: Review status of next Syntax WD 14: Review status of Schema WD 15: Review status and technical discussion on datatypes issue See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0343.html ------------------------------------------------------------ This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 13:36:52 UTC