- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 13:28:35 +0100
- To: melnik@db.stanford.edu
- Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> > [...] > > fine Sergey, but I think we have to face a testcase like > > aaa bbb "xyz". > > rdfs:range bbb ccc. > > It will concur somewhere presumably > > so what sense do we/machines make out of that? > > Did you mean > > aaa bbb "xyz" > bbb rdfs:range ccc ? yes I did (wondering how I could have written that) > If ccc is a subclass of rdfs:Literal, the example looks fine. If some > other conditions prohibit ccc from being a subclass of rdfs:Literal, > then the example has no valid interpretation, I guess. well, I'm wondering... let's take another testcase #### :Animal a rdfs:Class; <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#restrictedBy> [ a <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#Restriction>; <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#onProperty> :parent; <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#cardinality> "2" ]; rdfs:label "Animal" . #### what is that "2" denoting? the number 2, isn't it? I can't imagine that the range of <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#cardinality> is a subclass of rdfs:Literal -- Jos
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2001 07:28:56 UTC