- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 13:28:35 +0100
- To: melnik@db.stanford.edu
- Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> > [...]
> > fine Sergey, but I think we have to face a testcase like
> > aaa bbb "xyz".
> > rdfs:range bbb ccc.
> > It will concur somewhere presumably
> > so what sense do we/machines make out of that?
>
> Did you mean
>
> aaa bbb "xyz"
> bbb rdfs:range ccc ?
yes I did (wondering how I could have written that)
> If ccc is a subclass of rdfs:Literal, the example looks fine. If some
> other conditions prohibit ccc from being a subclass of rdfs:Literal,
> then the example has no valid interpretation, I guess.
well, I'm wondering...
let's take another testcase
####
:Animal a rdfs:Class;
<http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#restrictedBy> [
a <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#Restriction>;
<http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#onProperty> :parent;
<http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#cardinality> "2" ];
rdfs:label "Animal" .
####
what is that "2" denoting? the number 2, isn't it?
I can't imagine that the range of
<http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#cardinality>
is a subclass of rdfs:Literal
--
Jos
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2001 07:28:56 UTC