- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 17:51:31 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > Brian McBride wrote: > [...] > >> o Pat seems to reckon the model theory is simpler with a set. Can we extend >>the notion of a tidy graph so that it removes duplicate statements. Any untidy >>graph has an equivalent tidy graph, and the model theory is defined in terms of >>that. >> > > You seem to be discussing this as if issue #rdfms-graph > were to be resolved as per the Sep model theory WD. Right. In terms of our current WD. > > Please see my 11 Oct suggestion to replace it wholesale, which > was greeted with at least two voices of support: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0186.html Personally, I like that approach though I'd restrict it a bit for this iteration. Brian
Received on Saturday, 20 October 2001 12:55:59 UTC