- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 17:45:36 +0100
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> I'm starting to think this is worth changing the charter over: > if the xml:lang stuff is to be significant, it must be > in triple form. This issue came up at today's telecon. Both chairs indicated that if the WG goes with Sergey's suggestion of using bNodes for expressing structured literals, and the WG felt that the lang-string stuff was too much in conflict with this, then we should seek to be rechartered. (And I think I understood this more generally, i.e. the charter requirement to move forward on types may require us to request an easing of some of our other charter restrictions). For what its worth, using Jena 1.2 does give programmatic access to the xml:lang read in from RDF/XML. I believe we do not yet do lang tag comparison in a case insensitive fashion, but I think ARP normalizes case on input. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 19 October 2001 12:46:10 UTC