- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:03:17 +0100
- To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
I had a reaction against the wording .... > > 7: Propose resolution of whether graphs are sets or bags > > Propose the WG ACTION Pat to ensure that: > > the model theory uses tidy graphs from which duplicate arcs have been removed > > Further the WG notes that: > > o an RDF/XML document may represent an untidy graph which contains duplicate arcs > > o an n-triples document may represent an untidy graph which contains duplicate arcs > > See: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0489.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0496.html > (Sorry - this sort of mailing is tedious). Graphs for me are sets and cannot have duplicates to remove. How about: Propose the WG ACTION Pat to ensure that: the model theory uses graphs with no duplicate arcs Further the WG notes that: o an RDF/XML document may contains duplicate triples o an n-triples document may contains duplicate triples o and such triples map to a single arc in a graph. (Omitting the last point would leave Pat more wriggle room to take a multiset view of graphs if he so chooses). Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2001 13:58:29 UTC