- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 22:31:39 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>>>Dan Connolly said: > Dave Beckett wrote: > > > > I have been working on updating the document > > wow... nifty... > > > Please review > > http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Updated-Gra mmar-changes > > CVS Revision: 1.63 or later > > editorial/structural suggestions: > > * the "3. RDF Core WG Issues affecting RDF/XML Syntax" section > doesn't seem like part of the specification. I suggest moving > it to an appendix. OK, I've moved it to Appendix A > > * on the other hand, the references (at least the normative ones) > are not appendixes: lopping them off changes what's specified. Moved be last section before Appendices. > I like the "Infoset Notation"; especially the way it's > quite sax-like. Please make the connection to SAX explicit, > at least by saying something like "this notation loosely > follows the structure of the [SAX] API". Noted. That is the idea, since it matches what most parsers are written in, is very familiar to programmers and shows the multi-token context that is needed for RDF/XML. Above changes in CVS 1.64 or later. Dave
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2001 17:31:40 UTC