- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 22:31:39 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>>>Dan Connolly said:
> Dave Beckett wrote:
> >
> > I have been working on updating the document
>
> wow... nifty...
>
> > Please review
> > http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Updated-Gra
mmar-changes
> > CVS Revision: 1.63 or later
>
> editorial/structural suggestions:
>
> * the "3. RDF Core WG Issues affecting RDF/XML Syntax" section
> doesn't seem like part of the specification. I suggest moving
> it to an appendix.
OK, I've moved it to Appendix A
>
> * on the other hand, the references (at least the normative ones)
> are not appendixes: lopping them off changes what's specified.
Moved be last section before Appendices.
> I like the "Infoset Notation"; especially the way it's
> quite sax-like. Please make the connection to SAX explicit,
> at least by saying something like "this notation loosely
> follows the structure of the [SAX] API".
Noted.
That is the idea, since it matches what most parsers are written in,
is very familiar to programmers and shows the multi-token context
that is needed for RDF/XML.
Above changes in CVS 1.64 or later.
Dave
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2001 17:31:40 UTC