- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:04:25 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Wednesday, October 10, 2001, at 01:58 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:
> you guys told us a little bit about how folks are
> using RDF... would you please collect some uses cases/test cases
> that show how folks expect to use parsetype="Literal"?
I authored the RSS Content Module spec[1] which provides the
following example of how to include HTML inside an RSS item:
<item rdf:about="http://example.org/item/">
<title>The Example Item</title>
<link>http://example.org/item/</link>
<content:items><rdf:Bag>
<rdf:li><content:item>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoding rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-
xml#dt-wellformed" />
<rdf:value rdf:parseType="Literal"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<em>This is <strong>very</strong></em> <strong>cool</strong>.
</rdf:value>
</content:item></rdf:li>
</rdf:Bag></content:items>
</item>
This spec was approved by the RSS WG on 2001-03-01, but despite
this I cannot say that I've seen this portion of the spec
implemented.
[1] http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/
--
[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2001 14:04:28 UTC