- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 16:02:29 +0100 (BST)
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time: 10:00:00 Fri Oct 26 2001 in America/New York which is equivalent to 15:00:00 Fri Oct 26 2001 in Europe/London 23:00:00 Fri Oct 26 2001 in Asia/Seoul Phone: +1 630 536 3003 room #3003 irc: irc.openprojects.net #rdfcore 1: Allocate scribe 2: Roll Call 3: Review Agenda 4: Next telecon - 10am Boston time, 2nd Nov 2001 The next telecon will focus on specific technical issues(s). Which issues will be decided at the end of this telecon. 5: Review Minutes of previous meeting with correction See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0405.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0533.html 6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions ACTION: 2001-10-19#11 Sergey to post text attempting to state the two options, ASAP see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0530.html 7: Propose resolution of whether graphs are sets or bags Propose the WG ACTION Pat to ensure that: the model theory uses tidy graphs from which duplicate arcs have been removed Further the WG notes that: o an RDF/XML document may represent an untidy graph which contains duplicate arcs o an n-triples document may represent an untidy graph which contains duplicate arcs See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0489.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0496.html 8: Brief update on Primer status 9: Brief update on schema status 10: Status of Action 2001-08-02#7 Dave Beckett, with help from Art and Jan, investigate how to represent RDF/XML grammar and the specification of the transformation of RDF/XML to a graph representation. 11: Postpone syntax issues The aim here is to quickly resolve those issues for which there is clear concensus. If extended discussion is needed, we will postpone the decision. Propose the WG RESOLVE that the following issues be postponed for consideration by a future WG See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-quoting http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-qnames-cant-represent-all-uris http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-qname-uri-mapping http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-qnames-as-attrib-values http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-syntax-incomplete 12: Close syntax issues The aim here is to quickly resolve those issues for which there is clear concensus. If extended discussion is needed, we will postpone the decision. Propose the WG RESOLVE that the following issues be closed on the grounds that they are resolved by the new approach taken to defining the syntax. See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-syntax-desc-clarity http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-formal-grammar 13: Datatyping: Review Sergey's analysis and proposal See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0530.html 14: Decide on topics for next telecon ------------------------------------------------------------ This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2001 11:02:54 UTC