- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 09:46:22 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
I'll also point out that we had some feedback on CC/PP which suggested to me that the I18N group will be looking to see these issues clarified in this round of RDF. I think you're right that it's not really an option to ignore these issues. #g -- At 10:40 PM 9/26/01 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >I also remind everyone that xml:lang is a bit of an afterthought, >because the first WG did not consider internationalization issues until >they rushed it under pressure from the I18N WG. I have tried to give a >coherent account of how charmod applies to RDF Literals; I suspect it is >better to do it now, when we can take our leisure (despite my earlier >suggestions!). ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> ------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2001 17:19:18 UTC