Re: Objections to postponing issues

• From: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
• Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:40:35 -0700
• To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
• CC: RDFCore WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <3BDA1093.4EF7AA94@db.stanford.edu>

Aaron Swartz wrote:
> 
> In the telecon today I said that I had objections to postponing
> the following two issues:
>    http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value
>    http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-qname-uri-mapping
> [...]

I agree with Pat's comment that rdf:value will probably be taken care of
in datatyping (it may disapper, although I think it still may be useful
- use cases and possible interpretation are in my recent "suggestions
for datatyping" posting).

As to qname-uri-mapping, I believe it could be merged with
uri-substructure.

Sergey

Received on Friday, 26 October 2001 21:14:11 UTC