W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: MT comment - bagId ambiguity ...

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:17:19 -0500
Message-Id: <p05101014b7e22d606d7e@[]>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>This is really a comment about syntax than about MT.
>In MT, Pat says:
>"We understand linear RDF notations such as N-Triples and rdf/xml [RDF/XML]
>as lexical notations for describing an RDF graph"
>which seems innocuous enough, and appears to suggest that there is a
>function from RDF/XML documents to RDF graphs.
>Unfortunately, there isn't.

Indeed I had thought there was, but see your point. Ive changed this 
to "..for specifying an RDF graph" in an attempt to weaken the 
suggestion of the function. Suggestions for other wording are 
welcome, but I don't really want to get into the messy details at 
that point in the MT document, though, as it would side-track the 
exposition too much.


IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2001 11:17:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:05 UTC