Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects)

DaveB,

Does your new WD propose an answer to this this question?  Does it propose and 
an answer to the general qnames as attribute values question?

Brian

Bill de hOra wrote:

> Ron:
> 
>>We should probably warn people that in the future the number of values
>>of the parseType attribute will increase, and those values will
>>probably move to QNames. However, I don't think we need to actually
>>define a bunch of QNames now.
>>
> 
> Art:
> Yes, it would probably be good to add such a warning.
> 
> 
> This has already been actioned. There's text at:
> 
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0360.html>
> 
> paras 2-5.
> 
> 
> regards,
> Bill
> 
> .. 
> InterX 
> bdehora at interx.com 
> +44(0)20-8817-4039 
> www.interx.com 
> 
>  
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 06:27:28 UTC