- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:46:53 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 05:09 PM 10/15/01 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote: >>Jeremy Carroll said: >> >>> I would not be opposed to deleting parseType="Literal" >> >>As I mentioned in the 2001-10-12 call, there are several uses >>that have been reported. I'll repeat those for the record. > >Just in general, there ought to be a way for someone to include arbitrary >markup inside a piece of RDF without breaking an RDF processor. If >parseType="Literal" is the only way to do that, its better to keep it than >to toss it out. (Not that there might not be a better way, of course...:-) An alternative might be to &-escape the pointy brackets in the literal string; an XML processor would (should?) deliver them un-escaped as the actual literal string, I think. #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> ------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2001 07:28:44 UTC