Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about)

Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> You're not saying the XML solution conflicts with what RDF needs,
> are you? This issue is so messy that I have a hard time following...
> but if I understand correctly, the XML processors can
> follow the advice that the XML Core WG has given, and RDF
> stuff can be layered on top, and it all works out. True?

TRUE.



> 
> If folks are reading in RDF/xml with the intention of
> writing it back out as RDF/xml, I might suggest they
> keep the pre-decoded unicode string around as well
> as the US ASCII URI....

Yes that would be a good idea.



Jeremy

Received on Friday, 19 October 2001 14:00:32 UTC