- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:00:02 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > > You're not saying the XML solution conflicts with what RDF needs, > are you? This issue is so messy that I have a hard time following... > but if I understand correctly, the XML processors can > follow the advice that the XML Core WG has given, and RDF > stuff can be layered on top, and it all works out. True? TRUE. > > If folks are reading in RDF/xml with the intention of > writing it back out as RDF/xml, I might suggest they > keep the pre-decoded unicode string around as well > as the US ASCII URI.... Yes that would be a good idea. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 19 October 2001 14:00:32 UTC