W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:00:02 +0100
Message-ID: <3BD06A22.6766C289@hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org

Dan Connolly wrote:
> You're not saying the XML solution conflicts with what RDF needs,
> are you? This issue is so messy that I have a hard time following...
> but if I understand correctly, the XML processors can
> follow the advice that the XML Core WG has given, and RDF
> stuff can be layered on top, and it all works out. True?


> If folks are reading in RDF/xml with the intention of
> writing it back out as RDF/xml, I might suggest they
> keep the pre-decoded unicode string around as well
> as the US ASCII URI....

Yes that would be a good idea.

Received on Friday, 19 October 2001 14:00:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:05 UTC