w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from October 2001 by author

Aaron Swartz

• Objections to postponing issues (Friday, 26 October)
• Formats for HTTP Proxy Caches (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: RDF draft structure (was: Schedule) (Sunday, 14 October)
• RDF draft structure (was: Schedule) (Sunday, 14 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure) (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: Test cases for parseType="Literal" (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: Test cases for parseType="Literal" (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: golden triples (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: Test cases for parseType="Literal" (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. (Monday, 8 October)
• graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) (Thursday, 4 October)
• Re: Suggestion for next round of model theory document (Thursday, 4 October)
• Re: Suggestion for next round of model theory document (Thursday, 4 October)

Art Barstow

• Test Case doc updated (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Test case for duplicate properties (Friday, 26 October)
• Minutes: Syntax subgroup teleconf - Oct 26, 2001 (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: PRIMER: some text on striping - useful? (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Test cases for parseType mis-spelling errors (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: parseType case sensitivity of values? (was Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-19) (Friday, 19 October)
• *way* off topic [Was: Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr] (Friday, 19 October)
• Test cases for parseType mis-spelling errors (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Issue Tracking doc needs test case link updates (Monday, 15 October)
• 2001-10-12#2 - review rdfs-domain-and-range TCs (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: 2001-09-28#9 - proposal for obsoleting test cases (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Thursday, 11 October)
• 2001-09-28#4 - review rdfs-no-cycles-in-subPropertyOf test case (Thursday, 11 October)
• 2001-09-28#9 - proposal for obsoleting test cases & repo management (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: Test cases for parseType="Literal" (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure) (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Test cases for parseType="Literal" (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) (Monday, 8 October)
• RelaxNG non-XML vs XML Infoset [Was: Re: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday] (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?) (Tuesday, 2 October)
• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-09-28 (Monday, 1 October)

Bill de hOra

• RE: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Friday, 19 October)
• regrets (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: literals must be self-evident (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: literals must be self-evident (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection (Wednesday, 17 October)
• PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section (Monday, 15 October)
• RE: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Monday, 15 October)
• RE: RDF draft structure (was: Schedule) (Monday, 15 October)

Brian McBride

• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2001-10-26 (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: A strange question (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: A strange question (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Minutes of 19-Oct-2001 teleconference (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Test cases for parseType mis-spelling errors (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Concrete datatype use case (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Concrete datatype use case (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Concrete datatype use case (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: Proposal to incorporate datatyping into the model theory (was Re: datatyping discussion) (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: datatyping discussion (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: literals must be self-evident (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Sunday, 21 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Saturday, 20 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Saturday, 20 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Saturday, 20 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Saturday, 20 October)
• Re: Test cases for parseType mis-spelling errors (Saturday, 20 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Saturday, 20 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Saturday, 20 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Saturday, 20 October)
• Re: datatyping discussion (Friday, 19 October)
• F2F at Tech Plenary 25th Feb - 1 Mar 2002 (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: *way* off topic [Was: Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr] (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (was Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work ) (Thursday, 18 October)
• Updated: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-19 (Thursday, 18 October)
• action #2001-09-28/7 remove xml:base from test cases (Thursday, 18 October)
• Agenda will be late (Thursday, 18 October)
• Weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Issue Tracking doc needs test case link updates (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: future F2F meetings (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Dilbert (Tuesday, 16 October)
• [Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-12] (Friday, 12 October)
• Schedule (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: 2001-09-28#9 - proposal for obsoleting test cases (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-09-28 (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: Actions/Decisions from the RDFCore Telecon 2001-09-28 (Thursday, 11 October)
• Action 2001-09-28#13 show Sergey as owner of rdfs-xml-datatypes (Thursday, 11 October)
• Call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: ConstraintProperty/ConstrainResource: good riddance (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: ConstraintProperty/ConstrainResource: good riddance (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-09-28 (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: golden triples (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: model theory state of play (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: Issues list update/status? (Friday, 28 September)
• WD Feedback (Friday, 28 September)

bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com

• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26 (Thursday, 25 October)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-19 (Thursday, 18 October)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-12 (Thursday, 11 October)

Dan Brickley

• new Web Ontology WG announced (Saturday, 27 October)
• XML Schema datatypes: real world usage of gMonth (fwd) (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: ACTION: 2001-10-19#9 - constraint resources (proposed dropping of) (Friday, 26 October)
• ACTION: 2001-10-19#9 - constraint resources (proposed dropping of) (Friday, 26 October)
• RDFS spec: range/domain wordsmithing -- help needed (Thursday, 25 October)
• PRIMER: some text on striping - useful? (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Saturday, 20 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: RDF draft structure (was: Schedule) (Sunday, 14 October)
• PRIMER: RDF/SW in context talk -- raw materials for primer? (Saturday, 13 October)
• Re: PRIMER: contributions (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: Some controversial triples (Friday, 5 October)

Dan Connolly

• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Saturday, 20 October)
• Re: Active issue rdfms-graph; formal description of properties ofan RDF graph (Saturday, 20 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Saturday, 20 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Saturday, 20 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Saturday, 20 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: literals must be self-evident (Thursday, 18 October)
• literals must be self-evident (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (editorial) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Sunday, 14 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Saturday, 13 October)
• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text (Saturday, 13 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Saturday, 13 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Saturday, 13 October)
• Re: Schedule (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: Active issue rdfms-graph; formal description of properties of an RDF graph (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Thursday, 11 October)
• parseType="Literal" as syntactic sugar for infoset description (#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure) (Wednesday, 10 October)
• use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure) (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Tuesday, 9 October)
• ConstraintProperty/ConstrainResource: good riddance (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday (Tuesday, 2 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Monday, 1 October)

Dave Beckett

• Re: Reject change to rdf:value (Monday, 29 October)
• Syntax issues to be discussed / resolved (Wednesday, 24 October)
• RDF/XML Syntax WD work-in-progress for review (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (was Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work ) (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (was Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work ) (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-is-xml-structure) (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (editorial) (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (editorial) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Literals as subjects, labels for nodes (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Ntriples++ (was Re: Banishing "bNode") (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Literals as subjects, labels for nodes (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: Banishing "bNode" (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: Test cases for parseType="Literal" (Thursday, 11 October)
• RDF Core WG Syntax subgroup minutes for telecon 2001-10-05 (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: RelaxNG non-XML vs XML Infoset [Was: Re: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday] (Friday, 5 October)
• SYNTAX: XSLT and RelaxNG pointers (Tuesday, 2 October)
• SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday (Tuesday, 2 October)
• RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-09-28 (Monday, 1 October)

dehora

• RE: Why reification doesn't make sense (was: Re: PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection (Tuesday, 23 October)
• RE: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Sunday, 14 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Sunday, 14 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Sunday, 14 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Saturday, 13 October)
• regrets (Friday, 12 October)

Eric Miller

• RDF Core Syntax Teleconference Logistics (Wednesday, 24 October)
• parseType case sensitivity of values? (was Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-19) (Friday, 19 October)
• PRIMER status (was Re: PRIMER: contributions) (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: PRIMER: contributions (Friday, 12 October)

Francois Yergeau

• RE: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) (Friday, 19 October)
• RE: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) (Friday, 19 October)

Frank Boumphrey

• New email address (Wednesday, 24 October)

Frank Manola

• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• future F2F meetings (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section (Monday, 15 October)
• PRIMER: draft data model section (Sunday, 14 October)
• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text (Sunday, 14 October)
• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text (Saturday, 13 October)
• ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: PRIMER: contributions (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. (Monday, 8 October)

Gerald Oskoboiny

• delayed mail to w3c-rdfcore-wg (Tuesday, 2 October)

Graham Klyne

• Re: datatypes [was Re: Argh!] (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: Reject change to rdf:value (was Re: Comments to item 11 of agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26) (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: Minutes: Syntax subgroup teleconf - Oct 26, 2001 (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Friday, 26 October)
• Comments to Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26 (Friday, 26 October)
• Comments to item 11 of agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26 (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: RDFS spec: range/domain wordsmithing -- help needed (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: A strange question (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Musing about "reification" (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Concrete datatype use case (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Musing about "reification" (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Concrete datatype use case (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Proposal to incorporate datatyping into the model theory (was Re: datatyping discussion) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: Proposal to incorporate datatyping into the model theory (was Re: datatyping discussion) (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: datatyping discussion (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Regrets, telecon this Friday (Sunday, 21 October)
• Re: Test cases for parseType mis-spelling errors (Sunday, 21 October)
• Re: Active issue rdfms-graph; formal description of properties ofan RDF graph (Sunday, 21 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: use of log:semantics (Friday, 19 October)
• Minutes of 19-Oct-2001 teleconference (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: datatyping discussion (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: literals must be self-evident (Wednesday, 17 October)
• I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Tuesday, 16 October)
• 2001-10-12#4: gk to bring this back to table [anon issue] (Tuesday, 16 October)
• RE: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Very off-topic: citing emails (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: Active issue rdfms-graph; formal description of properties of an RDF graph (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: model theory and literals (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: model theory and literals (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) & changes in MT (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: Test cases for parseType="Literal" (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Saturday, 6 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Saturday, 6 October)
• Re: Some controversial triples (Friday, 5 October)
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday (Thursday, 4 October)
• Re: Suggestion for next round of model theory document (Thursday, 4 October)
• Re: Suggestion for next round of model theory document (Thursday, 4 October)
• Re: Some bad news, and some good news, on the MT revision. (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: some errors in the MT (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Reification in RDF MT (probably off-topic) (Friday, 7 September)
• Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Tuesday, 2 October)
• Suggestion for next round of model theory document (Tuesday, 2 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Tuesday, 2 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: Literals, language, equality (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Monday, 1 October)

Jan Grant

• RE: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Sunday, 21 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: Literals as subjects, labels for nodes (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Monday, 8 October)
• Regrets, Friday's telecon. (2001-10-12) (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) (Thursday, 4 October)
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday (Tuesday, 2 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday (Tuesday, 2 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Tuesday, 2 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Monday, 1 October)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data modelsection) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26 (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) (Thursday, 25 October)
• RE: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Thursday, 25 October)
• RE: SYNTAX: anon nodes (was RDF Syntax Telecon Friday) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• RE: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Concrete datatype use case (Tuesday, 23 October)
• complex numbers (Tuesday, 23 October)
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: DPH (Monday, 22 October)
• I18N issues proposed issues and postponement (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: Triples doc for review (with XSLT) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: Triples doc for review (without XSLT) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) (Friday, 19 October)
• Triples doc for review (later) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) (Friday, 19 October)
• RE: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: parseType case sensitivity of values? (was Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-19) (Friday, 19 October)
• RE: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: F2F at Tech Plenary 25th Feb - 1 Mar 2002 (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: Test cases for parseType mis-spelling errors (Thursday, 18 October)
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: literals must be self-evident (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) (Wednesday, 17 October)
• SYNTAX: triple production (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-is-xml-structure) (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (editorial) (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: DPH (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Wednesday, 17 October)
• N-Triples and Unicode string values (Monday, 15 October)
• RE: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Monday, 15 October)
• RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12 (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: [Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-12] (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: 2001-09-28#9 - proposal for obsoleting test cases (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: 2001-09-28#9 - proposal for obsoleting test cases (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Wednesday, 10 October)
• SYNTAX: golden triple: snail rules + draft write up (Wednesday, 10 October)
• RE: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. (Tuesday, 9 October)
• RE: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. (Tuesday, 9 October)
• RE: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. (Monday, 8 October)
• NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. (Monday, 8 October)
• RE: A proposal for entailment tests (Monday, 8 October)
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday (Thursday, 4 October)
• Re: Suggestion for next round of model theory document (Thursday, 4 October)
• Re: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?) (Thursday, 4 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests (Monday, 24 September)
• SYNTAX: bNode ids in XSLT (Tuesday, 2 October)
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday (Tuesday, 2 October)
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday (Tuesday, 2 October)
• Charmod conformance (Monday, 1 October)
• MT comment - bagId ambiguity ... (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Monday, 1 October)
• 2001-09-28#6: container test4 repost (Monday, 1 October)

John Cowan

• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) (Friday, 26 October)

jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) (Thursday, 1 November)
• Re: Test Case doc updated (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: ACTION: 2001-10-19#9 - constraint resources (proposed dropping of) (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: A strange question (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: A strange question (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: entailment test case etc001 (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: entailment test case etc001 (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: datatyping discussion (Monday, 22 October)
• entailment test case etc001 (Sunday, 21 October)
• Re: use of log:semantics (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: F2F at Tech Plenary 25th Feb - 1 Mar 2002 (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: 2001-10-12#2 - review rdfs-domain-and-range TCs (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: use of log:semantics (Friday, 19 October)
• interpetation properties 2 (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: 2001-10-12#2 - review rdfs-domain-and-range TCs (Wednesday, 17 October)
• status ACTION 2001-10-12#3 and #6 (Was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: Interpretation property (Saturday, 13 October)
• Re: model theory and literals (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: ConstraintProperty/ConstrainResource: good riddance (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: golden triples (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests (Saturday, 6 October)
• Re: model theory state of play (Thursday, 4 October)
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests (Wednesday, 3 October)

Mark Davis

• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) (Friday, 19 October)

Martin Duerst

• Re: I18N issues proposed issues and postponement (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) (Thursday, 18 October)

Martyn Horner

• Re: datatyping discussion (Friday, 19 October)
• PRIMER: contributions (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: Issues list update/status? (Wednesday, 3 October)

Pat Hayes

• Re: Objections to postponing issues (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: ACTION: 2001-10-19#9 - constraint resources (proposed dropping of) (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: RDFS spec: range/domain wordsmithing -- help needed (Friday, 26 October)
• Reject change to rdf:value (was Re: Comments to item 11 of agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26) (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: A strange question (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: A strange question (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26 (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: cheating about reification (Thursday, 25 October)
• How many answers? (was: Re: existential answers to queries (was: Re: on behalf of sandro)) (Thursday, 25 October)
• How many answers? (was: Re: existential answers to queries (was: Re: on behalf of sandro)) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: A strange question (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) (Thursday, 25 October)
• RE: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: cheating about reification (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Concrete datatype use case (Wednesday, 24 October)
• A strange question (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Musing about "reification" (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: entailment test case etc001 (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• RE: Why reification doesn't make sense (was: Re: PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: entailment test case etc001 (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Concrete datatype use case (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Proposal to incorporate datatyping into the model theory (was Re: datatyping discussion) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Why reification doesn't make sense (was: Re: PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: complex numbers (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Proposal to incorporate datatyping into the model theory (was Re: datatyping discussion) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: literals must be self-evident (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: use case challenge (was: Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr) (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: Active issue rdfms-graph; formal description of properties ofan RDF graph (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Tuesday, 23 October)
• What is reification? (was Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr) (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: interpetation properties 2 (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Monday, 22 October)
• Proposal to incorporate datatyping into the model theory (was Re: datatyping discussion) (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: datatyping discussion (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: datatyping discussion (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: literals must be self-evident (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: literals must be self-evident (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: DPH (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Literals as subjects, labels for nodes (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Where is the SW going? (was Re: Expressiveness of RDF as Rule Conclusion Language (was Re: What is an RDF Query? )) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Literals as subjects, labels for nodes (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: N-Triples and Unicode string values (Tuesday, 16 October)
• ACTION 2001-10-12#1: Pat (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Banishing "bNode" (Tuesday, 16 October)
• RE: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) (Monday, 15 October)
• RE: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Monday, 15 October)
• Ntriples++ (was Re: Banishing "bNode") (Monday, 15 October)
• Banishing "bNode" (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text (Sunday, 14 October)
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) (Saturday, 13 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Saturday, 13 October)
• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text (Saturday, 13 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Friday, 12 October)
• Regrets (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: Active issue rdfms-graph; formal description of properties of an RDF graph (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL (Thursday, 11 October)
• Active issue rdfms-graph; formal description of properties of an RDF graph (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: model theory and literals (Wednesday, 10 October)
• model theory and literals (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: ConstraintProperty/ConstrainResource: good riddance (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: datatypes and RDF Schema (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: model theory state of play (Tuesday, 9 October)
• RE: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. (Tuesday, 9 October)
• golden triples (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) & changes in MT (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests (Monday, 8 October)
• RE: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Friday, 5 October)
• Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests (Friday, 5 October)
• Some controversial triples (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: model theory state of play (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: Charmod conformance (Thursday, 4 October)
• Re: MT comment - bagId ambiguity ... (Thursday, 4 October)
• Re: Suggestion for next round of model theory document (Thursday, 4 October)
• model theory state of play (Thursday, 4 October)
• Some bad news, and some good news, on the MT revision. (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Re: Suggestion for next round of model theory document (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Re: heads-up on planned changes in MT (Wednesday, 3 October)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: datatypes [was Re: Argh!] (Tuesday, 30 October)
• datatypes [was Re: Argh!] (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: literals that do not have a single pre-speficied meaning (Tuesday, 9 October)

Ron Daniel

• RE: DPH (Monday, 22 October)
• RE: literals must be self-evident (Wednesday, 17 October)
• DPH (Tuesday, 16 October)
• RE: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• RE: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) (Monday, 15 October)
• RE: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (Monday, 15 October)
• after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) (Friday, 12 October)
• RE: Schedule (Friday, 12 October)

Sergey Melnik

• heading toward datatyping telecon (Thursday, 1 November)
• Re: datatypes [was Re: Argh!] (Tuesday, 30 October)
• Re: Argh! (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: Reject change to rdf:value (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: Objections to postponing issues (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: cheating about reification (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26 (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: cheating about reification (Thursday, 25 October)
• cheating about reification (Thursday, 25 October)
• suggestions for datatyping (long) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: datatyping discussion (Tuesday, 23 October)
• use case challenge (was: Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr) (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: F2F at Tech Plenary 25th Feb - 1 Mar 2002 (Monday, 22 October)
• datatyping discussion (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Saturday, 13 October)
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources (Friday, 12 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Saturday, 6 October)
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests (Saturday, 6 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) & changes in MT (Tuesday, 2 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Monday, 1 October)

Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM

• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2001-10-26 (Friday, 26 October)
• RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2001-10-26 (Friday, 26 October)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: use of log:semantics (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: use of log:semantics (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Thursday, 18 October)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 October 2001 22:52:57 UTC