- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 16:09:38 +0100
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: RDFCore WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 12:22 PM 10/1/01 +0100, Jan Grant wrote: >I've been thinking along very similar lines. See >http://ioctl.org/rdf/literals >which has a mix of related ideas, some good, some bad, some wrong. >Would paste in the relevant text here (apologies for not doing so) but >very slow line to university at the moment. >jan I took a look at that, and like the approach, even if it appears to be opposed from the one I suggested. (Actually, I think there's more in common than different.) I'd be interested to see how far this idea of literals denoting themselves goes in defining a literal as distinct from a resource. #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> ------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 1 October 2001 12:01:26 UTC