- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 09:29:57 -0400
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 01:18:30PM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: > 9: Cycles in subPropertyOf > > RESOLVED (unanimously): > > Deleting the restriction prohibiting cycles of subPropertyOf > properties. The meaning of a cycle of subPropertyOf properties is > an assertion that the properties involved in the cycle have the > same members. A more formal specification of the meaning is given > in the model theory. > > Propose: Approve the test case for this issue as given in: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0362.html > > Discussion showed that there needed to be a review of these > test cases before approval. > > ACTION 2001-09-28#3: Jos DeRoo > Review test cases in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0362.html > > ACTION 2001-09-28#4: Art Barstow > Review test cases in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0362.html Brian - although there is an issues for rdfs-no-cycles-in-subClassOf I did not find one for this test case (rdfs-no-cycles-in-subPropertyOf). Since the WG has made a decision on this, perhaps an issue should be added to: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/ Jos - thanks for adding Frank's test to the repository: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-no-cycles-in-subPropertyOf/ I made a few changes (added a CVS tag; removed unused namespace declarations; changed the RDFS namespace name from u to rdfs). Anyhow, the test looks OK to me.
Received on Monday, 1 October 2001 09:29:57 UTC