- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 13:25:13 -0400
- To: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:55:30AM -0400, Eric Miller wrote: > At 05:20 PM 10/18/2001 +0100, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com wrote: > > <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > xmlns:eg="http://example.org/"> > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.example.org"> > <eg:property rdf:parseType="literal">parseType attribute value is > mis-spelled</eg:property> > </rdf:Description> > </rdf:RDF> Given M&S says: [[ With RDF 1.0 other values must be treated as identical to 'Literal'. ]] it seems like these should yield: <http://www.example.org> <http://example.org/property> "parseType attribute value is mis-spelled" . > <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > xmlns:eg="http://example.org/"> > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.example.org"> > <eg:property rdf:parseType="resource"> > <rdf:value>parseType attribute value is mis-spelled</rdf:value> > </eg:property> > </rdf:Description> > </rdf:RDF> and: <http://www.example.org> <http://example.org/property> "<rdf:value xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">parseType attribute value is mis-spelled</rdf:value>" . A parser could also emit a warning. Do you agree with the N-Triples? Art ---
Received on Friday, 19 October 2001 13:25:12 UTC