- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 16:29:05 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> >I disagree; I think it's important to be clear about what RDF 1.0 >is and what it isn't, and the sooner the better. Perhaps it's >time to design RDF 1.x or RDF 2.0 that doesn't have these limitations. >But we can't do that (inside a W3C WG) until we're done with >RDF 1.0. OK, fair enough. Ive been trying to serve two masters here, obviously. Maybe if it is just a fact that DAML+OIL doesn't in fact fit onto RDF, then we ought to make this vividly clear rather than try to fix it. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2001 17:29:05 UTC