Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (editorial)

Dave Beckett wrote:
> 
> I have been working on updating the document

wow... nifty...

> Please review
>   http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Updated-Grammar-changes
>   CVS Revision: 1.63 or later

editorial/structural suggestions:

 * the "3. RDF Core WG Issues affecting RDF/XML Syntax" section
 doesn't seem like part of the specification. I suggest moving
 it to an appendix.

 * on the other hand, the references (at least the normative ones)
 are not appendixes: lopping them off changes what's specified.

I like the "Infoset Notation"; especially the way it's
quite sax-like. Please make the connection to SAX explicit,
at least by saying something like "this notation loosely
follows the structure of the [SAX] API".



-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2001 12:46:24 UTC