- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 01:14:14 +0100
- To: melnik@db.stanford.edu
- Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> For your example above I'd rather suggest > > :Animal a rdfs:Class; > <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#restrictedBy> [ > a <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#Restriction>; > <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#onProperty> :parent; > <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#cardinality> [ > xsd:int "2" ]; > ]; > rdfs:label "Animal" . > > if xsd:int is a relationship that maps the lexical space of integers to > the value space of integers, or > > :Animal a rdfs:Class; > <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#restrictedBy> [ > a <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#Restriction>; > <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#onProperty> :parent; > <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#cardinality> [ > a xsd:int; > rdf:value "2" ]; > ]; > rdfs:label "Animal" . > > if xsd:int is a class (rdf:value could denote a "default" relationships > between integers and literals). part of the job is to unify this stuff in engines and I can't find an ambiguity with the original example... although I agree that your descriptions could be invented as well, which is challenging to unify them with each other... -- Jos
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2001 19:14:45 UTC