- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 10:38:30 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Jeremy Carroll wrote: >>I'm starting to think this is worth changing the charter over: >>if the xml:lang stuff is to be significant, it must be >>in triple form. >> > > This issue came up at today's telecon. > Both chairs indicated that if the WG goes with Sergey's suggestion of using > bNodes for expressing structured literals, and the WG felt that the > lang-string stuff was too much in conflict with this, then we should seek to > be rechartered. (And I think I understood this more generally, i.e. the > charter requirement to move forward on types may require us to request an > easing of some of our other charter restrictions). That is not what this particular chair said. I believe I said, that datatyping was important, that we should 'get it right', and if getting it right was in conflict with the charter, we should solve the charter problem. I note ;) that one way to solve this sort of charter problem would be to leave such an issue for the next round. I say this not because I'm advocating that at this stage, but just to make sure folks understand we are not necessarily running out an liberalising the charter right now. Brian
Received on Saturday, 20 October 2001 05:43:01 UTC