- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:12:14 +0100
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Jeremy: > > I would not be opposed to deleting parseType="Literal" DanC: > I would prefer that to the extremely loose interpretation you're > suggesting... I do not want to break all RDF/XML processors (or all but one) and anything other than an extremely loose interpretation or straight deletion will do that. Jeremy: > Your .nt attachment suggests that represtentations that are > indistinguishable from strings are OK. That's going to far, for me. That is my intent. > > > Taking your challenge and following 2, I attach an n-triples file. > > > > The literal, (in pieces that need to be concatenated is) > > > > "\n Ramifications of\n <apply xmlns=\"http://www" > > ".w3.org/TR/REC-mathml\" xmlns:dc=\"http://purl.org/metadata/d" > > "ublin_core#\" xmlns:rdf=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-sy" > > "ntax-ns#\">\n <power></power>\n <apply>\n " > > " <plus></plus>\n <ci>a</ci>\n <ci>b</ci>" > > "\n </apply>\n <cn>2</cn>\n </apply>\n " > > " to World Peace\n " > > That doesn't make it clear that it's a parseType="Literal" > value. No. The only way to tell is to stick it betwenn "<foo>" and "</foo>" and try parsing it with an XML parser. DanC: > That .nt file (after I put a period at the end > of the last line) also corresponds to this RDF/XML input: > > <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/metadata/dublin_core#" > xmlns:log="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#" > xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"> > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://mycorp.com/papers/NobelPaper1"> > <Creator>David Hume</Creator> > <Title> > Ramifications of > <apply xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-mathml" > xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/metadata/dublin_core#" > xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"> > <power></power> > <apply> > <plus></plus> > <ci>a</ci> > <ci>b</ci> > </apply> > <cn>2</cn> > </apply> > to World Peace > </Title> > </rdf:Description> > </rdf:RDF> > Well, I am not going to check it! But yes, that is the idea. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 12 October 2001 05:07:50 UTC