- From: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 10:08:40 -0800
- To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- CC: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com wrote: > [...] > let's take another testcase > #### > :Animal a rdfs:Class; > <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#restrictedBy> [ > a <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#Restriction>; > <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#onProperty> :parent; > <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#cardinality> "2" ]; > rdfs:label "Animal" . > #### > what is that "2" denoting? the number 2, isn't it? > I can't imagine that the range of > <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#cardinality> > is a subclass of rdfs:Literal You are right, according to the DAML/OIL schema, "2" is supposed to be a nonNegativeInteger. Following Pat's proposal, "2" could denote many different things like numbers, shoe sizes and weights in pounds depending on the context. In my opinion, this ambiguity is counterproductive and is a heavy burden for interoperability. If literals may denote everything you like (and many things at once), I don't see why we need resources/URIs any more. We could do just fine with literals. For example, literal "Peter" could denote a person, sometimes Peter Pan, another time Peter The Great (even in the same graph!). Literal "2" in the above example could well denote Peter The Great, too. I strongly believe that each symbol (node in a graph, Ntriple token, literal string) must map to exactly one thing in the domain of discourse. Otherwise RDF does not give us any advantages over XML at all, since practically everything we write may be given some contrived meaning. For your example above I'd rather suggest :Animal a rdfs:Class; <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#restrictedBy> [ a <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#Restriction>; <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#onProperty> :parent; <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#cardinality> [ xsd:int "2" ]; ]; rdfs:label "Animal" . if xsd:int is a relationship that maps the lexical space of integers to the value space of integers, or :Animal a rdfs:Class; <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#restrictedBy> [ a <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#Restriction>; <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#onProperty> :parent; <http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#cardinality> [ a xsd:int; rdf:value "2" ]; ]; rdfs:label "Animal" . if xsd:int is a class (rdf:value could denote a "default" relationships between integers and literals). Sergey
Received on Monday, 29 October 2001 12:42:09 UTC