- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:21:22 +0100
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>>>Brian McBride said: <snip/> > Thanks for calling this out Dave. I'd like to see a general policy that > proposals that change what M&S says, or the common interpretation of what it > says, are specifically highlighted. > > It would be easier to just say, we are not changing the current spec, but we > already have precedent, aboutEachPrefix, that we will change something if we > feel there are very strong reasons to do so. > > I haven't seen any such case made for this change. I've no particular strong reason for making this change, rather than just neatness or consistency and as issue owner, I want to get it closed. In this case it seems like even if it was not used much, we can keep it around in the syntax without too much trouble - solving it with better wording and specification. Anyone who has a very good reason for a requirement to change this, please can you give evidence, as Brian asks. Dave
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 14:24:38 UTC