public-rdf-wg@w3.org from May 2012 by author

Alex Hall

• Re: Agenda 23 May telecon - final (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Turtle and predicate object lists. (Monday, 14 May)

Andy Seaborne

• Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Why empty named graphs make sense (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: Semantics for stateful resources (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: Invitation to join next JSON-LD telecon (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: Semantics for stateful resources (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: ISSUE-28 (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: ISSUE-28 - two readings? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• ISSUE-28 - two readings? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: trying to enforce IRI syntax (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: N-triples white space question (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: N-triples white space question (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: N-triples white space question (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: N-triples white space question (Friday, 18 May)
• N-triples white space question (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (Thursday, 17 May)
• Why empty named graphs make sense (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Checking: Turtle grammar / N-Triples Grammar (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Checking: Turtle grammar / N-Triples Grammar (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Checking: Turtle grammar / N-Triples Grammar (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: whitespace in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: whitespace in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Turtle and predicate object lists. (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Turtle and predicate object lists. (Monday, 14 May)
• Turtle and predicate object lists. (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: trusting quads (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: named graphs in HTML (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Sunday, 6 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: RDF Lists (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Please put "N-Triples" in the specification title (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Please put "N-Triples" in the specification title (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Turtle Draft (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Layers (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD (Tuesday, 1 May)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Re: Semantics for stateful resources (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Semantics for stateful resources (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Semantics for stateful resources (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Agenda 16 May telecon (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: understandings maths (Tuesday, 1 May)

Arnaud Le Hors

• Re: pre-agenda telecon 30 May (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 9 May 2012 (Wednesday, 9 May)

Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)

• RE: Agenda 30 May telecon (Wednesday, 30 May)
• RE: Agenda 16 May telecon (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: [ALL] Agenda 9 May 2012 (Wednesday, 9 May)

Charles Greer

• Re: [ALL] Agenda for 2 May 2012 (Tuesday, 1 May)

Dan Brickley

• Fwd: rdf:value instead bibo:content (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Slides for SemTech presentation on JSON-LD (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June (Monday, 28 May)
• Connected resources (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Redefining “resource” (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Redefining “resource” (was: Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources”) (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: policy for rdf: namespace? was Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Sandro's Formal Objection (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Sandro's Formal Objection (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Some real graphs (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: communicaton about Turtle compatibility (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: "whole reason quads were implemented" (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: trusting quads (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Layers (Wednesday, 2 May)

David Wood

• Re: Spec editorial: use RDFa 1.1 markup (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Agenda 30 May telecon (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: List of WG Resolutions (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: RDF Primer in Turtle (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June (Monday, 28 May)
• RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: List of WG Resolutions (Monday, 28 May)
• List of WG Resolutions (Sunday, 27 May)
• RDF Primer in Turtle (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: Invitation to join next JSON-LD telecon (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: AAAI Fellow (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: [ALL] WG Status Update Slides (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Closing ISSUE-13 (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• [ALL] WG Status Update Slides (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Unicode normalization in Turtle (Tuesday, 8 May)
• [ALL] Agenda 9 May 2012 (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" (Thursday, 3 May)
• [Turtle] Editorial Issue: Fwd: Please put "N-Triples" in the specification title (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: HTML datatype (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Layers (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-86 (GraphIsomorphism): Incompatible definitions of “graph equivalence” between RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics [RDF Concepts] (Tuesday, 1 May)
• [ALL] Agenda for 2 May 2012 (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: Layers (Tuesday, 1 May)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• remedial steps [Was: Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June] (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: High-level comments on Turtle document (Friday, 25 May)
• The problem with formal logic (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: N-triples white space question (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: N-triples white space question (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Checking: Turtle grammar / N-Triples Grammar (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: no-primary-key no-functional-change proposal convergence (Wednesday, 16 May)
• no-primary-key no-functional-change proposal convergence (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Checking: Turtle grammar / N-Triples Grammar (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Turtle and predicate object lists. (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Re: What does it mean to “implement RDF” or “conform to RDF”? (Saturday, 12 May)
• grammar alignment with SPARQL (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Monday, 7 May)

Gavin Carothers

• Re: Spec editorial: use RDFa 1.1 markup (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Proposal for getting Turtle to LC and N-Triples to FPWD (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Subsection 11.2 - Displaying (X)HTML (Friday, 18 May)
• N-triples white space question (Friday, 18 May)
• Proposal for getting Turtle to LC and N-Triples to FPWD (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: N-triples white space question (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: whitespace in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: whitespace in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Remaining Open Issues in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Unicode normalization in Turtle (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Sunday, 6 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Sunday, 6 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: HTML datatype (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Turtle Draft (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Turtle Draft (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Tuesday, 1 May)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: Spec editorial: use RDFa 1.1 markup (Thursday, 31 May)
• Spec editorial: use RDFa 1.1 markup (Thursday, 31 May)

Guus Schreiber

• Agenda 30 May telecon (Wednesday, 30 May)
• pre-agenda telecon 30 May (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: RDF Primer in Turtle (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: ISSUE-28 (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Agenda 23 May telecon - final (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Sandro's Formal Objection (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Data spaces draft (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Agenda 16 May telecon (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: types of "graphs" (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: types of "graphs" (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: types of "graphs" (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: types of "graphs" (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: the choice of the term "layer" (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" (Wednesday, 2 May)

Ivan Herman

• Fwd: Slides for SemTech presentation on JSON-LD (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: List of WG Resolutions (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: List of WG Resolutions (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: RDF Primer in Turtle (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: Question about RDF Spaces (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: RDF Primer in Turtle (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: status of xsd:duration in RDF (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Sunday, 20 May)
• Fwd: status of xsd:duration in RDF (Saturday, 19 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace") (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML datatype proposal (ISSUE-63) (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: [ALL] WG Status Update Slides (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: named graphs in HTML (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Unicode normalization in Turtle (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-87 (Revisit 2004 types): Revisit RDF 2004 datatypes that have proven troublesome in OWL and RIF (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Turtle Draft (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: Proposal for rdf:XMLLiteral (ISSUE-13) (Tuesday, 1 May)

Jeremy Carroll

• quintuples and Re: "whole reason quads were implemented" (Thursday, 10 May)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: Redefining “resource” (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Redefining “resource” (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Redefining “resource” (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Redefining “resource” (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Data spaces draft (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: trusting quads (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: GRAPH keyword in Turtle, PREFIX vs @prefix (was Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations) (Sunday, 6 May)
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Please put "N-Triples" in the specification title (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: the choice of the term "layer" (Wednesday, 2 May)

Lee Feigenbaum

• Re: GRAPH keyword in Turtle, PREFIX vs @prefix (was Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations) (Sunday, 6 May)
• Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil (Friday, 4 May)

Manu Sporny

• RDF WG minutes for 2012-05-30 (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: JSON-LD FPWD publication proposal (Wednesday, 30 May)
• JSON-LD FPWD publication proposal (Tuesday, 29 May)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-05-29 (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Invitation to join next JSON-LD telecon (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs (Friday, 25 May)
• Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG (Wednesday, 23 May)
• JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: RDF Lists (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil (Friday, 4 May)
• Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Friday, 4 May)
• Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil (Friday, 4 May)
• I really hate RDF Lists (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD (Friday, 4 May)

Nathan

• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? (Tuesday, 29 May)
• test - ignore (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML datatype proposal (ISSUE-63) (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)

Pat Hayes

• Re: how we refer to both g-boxes and g-snaps (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Why empty named graphs make sense (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Why empty named graphs make sense (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: Redefining “resource” (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Thursday, 24 May)
• AAAI Fellow (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Informative wording on identifiers for subgraphs (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Wednesday, 23 May)
• The problem with logic (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: ISSUE-28 (was: Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late) (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: ISSUE-28 - two readings? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: The entailment rules (was: Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft?) (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: status of xsd:duration in RDF (Saturday, 19 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace") (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: the term "named graphs" (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Layers (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-86 (GraphIsomorphism): Incompatible definitions of “graph equivalence” between RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics [RDF Concepts] (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) (Wednesday, 2 May)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: ISSUE-28 (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: status of xsd:duration in RDF (Monday, 21 May)
• minutes for RDF teleconference on 16 May (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Checking: Turtle grammar / N-Triples Grammar (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: whitespace in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: whitespace in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• whitespace in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• status of xsd:duration in OWL (and RIF and SPARQL) - ACTION-164: RDF WG (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) (Wednesday, 2 May)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: [ALL] Agenda for 2 May 2012 (Wednesday, 2 May)

RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

• RDF-ISSUE-91 (rdf-concepts-feedback): RDF Concepts feedback from Gavin and Pat [RDF Concepts] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• RDF-ISSUE-90 (LV-entailment): Define a simple form of �??literal value entailment�?? [RDF Semantics] (Monday, 21 May)
• RDF-ISSUE--1: (Monday, 21 May)
• RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RDF-ISSUE-88 (xsd:duration): Revisit the exclusion of xsd:duration from the RDF datatype list [RDF Concepts] (Wednesday, 2 May)
• RDF-ISSUE-87 (Revisit 2004 types): Revisit RDF 2004 datatypes that have proven troublesome in OWL and RIF (Wednesday, 2 May)
• RDF-ISSUE-86 (GraphIsomorphism): Incompatible definitions of �??graph equivalence�?? between RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics [RDF Concepts] (Tuesday, 1 May)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: Spec editorial: use RDFa 1.1 markup (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: JSON-LD FPWD publication proposal (Wednesday, 30 May)
• rdf11-concepts WD ready (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: List of WG Resolutions (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? (Monday, 28 May)
• rdf:HTML vs rdf:HTMLLiteral (was: Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June) (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: Redefining “resource” (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Redefining “resource” (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Redefining “resource” (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Redefining “resource” (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Redefining “resource” (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Semantics for stateful resources (Friday, 25 May)
• Redefining “resource” (was: Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources”) (Friday, 25 May)
• High-level comments on Turtle document (Friday, 25 May)
• Comments on RDF Spaces document (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Semantics for stateful resources (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: ISSUE-28 (was: Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late) (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Semantics for stateful resources (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Informative wording on identifiers for subgraphs (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Turtle conformance section (Wednesday, 23 May)
• ISSUE-28 (was: Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late) (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: ISSUE-28 - two readings? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 21 May)
• The entailment rules (was: Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft?) (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Proposal for getting Turtle to LC and N-Triples to FPWD (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE--1: (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Monday, 21 May)
• N-Quads syntax (was: Re: Making progress on graphs) (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: trying to enforce IRI syntax (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: N-triples white space question (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: N-triples white space question (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: policy for rdf: namespace? was Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: N-triples white space question (Friday, 18 May)
• rdf:HTML datatype added (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Subsection 11.2 - Displaying (X)HTML (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: “RDF systems” and empty graphs (was: Re: Making progress on graphs) (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• “RDF systems” and empty graphs (was: Re: Making progress on graphs) (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Turtle and predicate object lists. (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Sunday, 13 May)
• Making progress on graphs (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace") (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace") (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: communicaton about Turtle compatibility (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: What does it mean to “implement RDF” or “conform to RDF”? (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: What does it mean to “implement RDF” or “conform to RDF”? (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] (Thursday, 10 May)
• What does it mean to “implement RDF” or “conform to RDF”? (Thursday, 10 May)
• Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace") (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML datatype proposal (ISSUE-63) (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML datatype proposal (ISSUE-63) (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML datatype proposal (ISSUE-63) (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Thursday, 10 May)
• HTML datatype proposal (ISSUE-63) (Thursday, 10 May)
• Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: types of "graphs" (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: types of "graphs" (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: [ALL] WG Status Update Slides (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Defining rdf:XMLLiteral in terms of the DOM (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: Unicode normalization in Turtle (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Unicode normalization in Turtle (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Saturday, 5 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Please put "N-Triples" in the specification title (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• HTML datatype (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Two ACTIONs for RDF Semantics editors (Wednesday, 2 May)
• May 2 telecon minutes (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Proposal for rdf:XMLLiteral (ISSUE-13) (Tuesday, 1 May)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: how we refer to both g-boxes and g-snaps (ISSUE-32) (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Why empty named graphs make sense (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Proposal for getting Turtle to LC and N-Triples to FPWD (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document (Tuesday, 29 May)
• n-quads & Turtle Levels (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: Question about RDF Spaces (Tuesday, 29 May)
• how we refer to both g-boxes and g-snaps (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: Turtle conformance section (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: Question about RDF Spaces (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: ISSUE-28 (was: Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late) (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Friday, 18 May)
• trying to enforce IRI syntax (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: N-triples white space question (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Friday, 18 May)
• turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Thursday, 17 May)
• New Provenance Drafts -- ready for review -- getting close to LC (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Data spaces draft (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Sandro's Formal Objection (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: “RDF systems” and empty graphs (was: Re: Making progress on graphs) (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 14 May)
• policy for rdf: namespace? was Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Sunday, 13 May)
• communicaton about Turtle compatibility (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: What does it mean to “implement RDF” or “conform to RDF”? (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: trusting quads (Thursday, 10 May)
• "whole reason quads were implemented" (Thursday, 10 May)
• trusting quads (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• named graphs in HTML (Wednesday, 9 May)
• rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: 6.3 -- proposal for (informal) dataset semantics (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: GRAPH keyword in Turtle, PREFIX vs @prefix (was Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations) (Sunday, 6 May)
• GRAPH keyword in Turtle, PREFIX vs @prefix (was Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations) (Sunday, 6 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Sunday, 6 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Sunday, 6 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Sunday, 6 May)
• types of "graphs" (Saturday, 5 May)
• Re: Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD (Saturday, 5 May)
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Saturday, 5 May)
• Re: RDF Lists (Saturday, 5 May)
• the choice of the term "layer" (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: the term "named graphs" (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Wednesday, 2 May)
• strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Layers (or maybe "Data Layers") (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: understandings maths (Tuesday, 1 May)
• understandings maths (Tuesday, 1 May)

Scott Bauer

• Re: I really hate RDF Lists (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda for 2 May 2012 (Wednesday, 2 May)

Souripriya Das

• Re: Agenda 23 May telecon - final (Wednesday, 23 May)

Steve Harris

• Re: RDF Primer in Turtle (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: Redefining “resource” (was: Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources”) (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Proposal for getting Turtle to LC and N-Triples to FPWD (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: policy for rdf: namespace? was Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Making progress on graphs (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Agenda 16 May telecon (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Turtle and predicate object lists. (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: HTML datatype proposal (ISSUE-63) (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: trusting quads (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: trusting quads (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: trusting quads (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: rdf-spaces (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: [ALL] WG Status Update Slides (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: 6.3 -- proposal for (informal) dataset semantics (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: GRAPH keyword in Turtle, PREFIX vs @prefix (was Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: RDF Lists (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: the choice of the term "layer" (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: 6.3 -- proposal for (informal) dataset semantics (Tuesday, 8 May)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• Re: Data spaces draft (Wednesday, 16 May)

Thomas Baker

• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Drop ?g-boxes?, talk about ?stateful resources? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace") (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace") (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil (Friday, 4 May)
• Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: the choice of the term "layer" (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Layers (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Tuesday, 1 May)

Thomas Steiner

• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG (Tuesday, 22 May)

William Waites

• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations (Friday, 4 May)

Yves Raimond

• RE: Agenda 30 May telecon (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Agenda 16 May telecon (Wednesday, 16 May)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 May 2012 23:39:51 UTC