W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Proposal for getting Turtle to LC and N-Triples to FPWD

From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 11:55:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPqY83xcmq-8soKEbTTDQFJegXp-KG86=ahoi=NDSZaK+zrpnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: RDF-WG WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name> wrote:
> Proposal
> =======
>
> Separate N-Triples from Turtle document. Publish Turtle as Last Call,
> publish N-Triples as FPWD

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html No
longer contains N-Triples.
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/n-triples.html
Initial very rough split of N-Triples into it's own document.

>
> Rationale
> ========
>
> This is the first publication of N-Triples, there will be a great deal
> of feedback as it stands the N-Triples section of the Turtle document
> is not ready for Last Call. The Turtle specification itself is made
> worse by trying to explain N-Triples at the same time as Turtle.
> Examples will need to be duplicated, confusion about is the same
> between Turtle and N-Triples is increased not decreased. It will be
> easier to create better recommendations with them as two separate
> documents than the current combined form.
>
>
>
> I'm perfectly happy to keep editing both documents and get both of
> them to Last Call as soon as possible.
>
> --Gavin
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 18:55:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:49 GMT