- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 21:53:46 +0200
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
And, let us not forget what we did just a few hours ago: XMLLiterals were the source of major headaches... Ivan --- Ivan Herman Tel:+31 641044153 http://www.ivan-herman.net (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...) On 9 May 2012, at 21:32, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote: > On 9 May 2012, at 19:15, Steve Harris wrote: >> I would mention bNode skolemisation / genids - it's a problem that most people dealing with RDF have faced. Makes bNodes useful in the same way that auto_increment columns in SQL are. >> >> Also Turtle / SPARQL syntax harmonisation is worth mentioning. > > +1 to both. > > There's a list of the minor RDF Concepts improvements in the spec — a couple of them are worth mentioning: > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#changes > > Best, > Richard > > > >> >> - Steve >> >> On 9 May 2012, at 05:36, David Wood wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I will be providing an update the RDF WG's activities and accomplishments at the SemTechBiz conference in San Francisco next month. My slides are officially overdue, so I would like to submit them soon. >>> >>> Some parts of the talk are obvious (e.g. Turtle and n-triples status), others are decidedly less so (graphs). >>> >>> Any thoughts on what should be covered and what should be avoided would be appreciated. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Steve Harris, CTO >> Garlik, a part of Experian >> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK >> +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ >> Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 >> Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, NG2 Business Park, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, England NG80 1ZZ >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 19:54:10 UTC