W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: ISSUE-28

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 14:27:31 +0100
Message-ID: <4FBCE5C3.1050809@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org


On 23/05/12 13:42, Pat Hayes wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2012, at 7:19 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>
>> Pat,
>>
>> On 23 May 2012, at 02:02, Pat Hayes wrote:
>>> My votes on proposed resolutoins for issues 5, 29, 30 and 33 are +1, and my vote on the resolution for issue-28 is +1, provided that the WG accepts that this resolution has the consequence that we MUST give a semantics to datasets which ensures that the name of a named graph actually does denote the graph, in the 2004 Semantics sense of "denote". Without this acceptance, I formally vote against this resolution for issue 28.
>>
>> Let me propose a different wording for the ISSUE-28 resolution then:
>>
>> [[
>> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-28 ("Do we need syntactic nesting of graphs (g-texts) as in N3?"), saying No, we do not -- the use cases presented to the WG can be addressed without, and making syntactic nesting pay off would require additional logic machinery that's beyond this WG's scope.
>> ]]
>>
>> The point being that nesting may be a great enabler for things like N3 rules or your RDF Surfaces proposal, but are not really worth it unless we also get N3's @forall or your negative surfaces, and I think it's clear that this WG cannot do that. So no need to complicate our current job by writing nested graphs into the standard now.
>
> OK, I am cool with that wording. +1 vote.
 >

and

+1

from me to the revised resolution proposal.

     Andy

>
> Pat
>
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Pat
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 22, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> There is draft agenda containing the left overs from last week:
>>>>
>>>>   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.05.23
>>>>
>>>> but I will update this with a few more items later today.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Guus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
>>> 40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
>>> Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
>>> FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
>>> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
> 40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 13:28:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:49 GMT