W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: communicaton about Turtle compatibility

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 22:02:55 +0200
Message-Id: <E7997F9B-004B-4EF3-B7C6-755197A14FBE@danbri.org>
Cc: public-rdf-wg <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>

On 12 May 2012, at 21:52, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

> What's our story on versioning (backward and forward compatibility) for
> the Turtle language?

Since SPARQL is essentially the same notation, with adaptations for asking questions instead of making claims, it would be good to have the corresponding SPARQL story to hand too.

Dan

Received on Saturday, 12 May 2012 20:03:35 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Thomas Baker: "Re: Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace")"
Previous message: Sandro Hawke: "communicaton about Turtle compatibility"
In reply to: Sandro Hawke: "communicaton about Turtle compatibility"
Next in thread: Richard Cyganiak: "Re: communicaton about Turtle compatibility"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:48 GMT