W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Proposal for getting Turtle to LC and N-Triples to FPWD

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 12:09:16 +0100
Message-Id: <1D4F6054-3CE3-4C08-9078-FF1864700685@cyganiak.de>
To: RDF-WG WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
+1 from me too. Makes N-Triples easier to google, easier to reference, and makes both documents easier to explain/motivate.

Best,
Richard


On 21 May 2012, at 11:16, Steve Harris wrote:

> +1
> 
> Though they're technically similar, I think the motivations, and reasons for their use are quite different.
> 
> - Steve
> 
> On 2012-05-18, at 18:50, Gavin Carothers wrote:
> 
>> Proposal
>> =======
>> 
>> Separate N-Triples from Turtle document. Publish Turtle as Last Call,
>> publish N-Triples as FPWD
>> 
>> Rationale
>> ========
>> 
>> This is the first publication of N-Triples, there will be a great deal
>> of feedback as it stands the N-Triples section of the Turtle document
>> is not ready for Last Call. The Turtle specification itself is made
>> worse by trying to explain N-Triples at the same time as Turtle.
>> Examples will need to be duplicated, confusion about is the same
>> between Turtle and N-Triples is increased not decreased. It will be
>> easier to create better recommendations with them as two separate
>> documents than the current combined form.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I'm perfectly happy to keep editing both documents and get both of
>> them to Last Call as soon as possible.
>> 
>> --Gavin
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Steve Harris, CTO
> Garlik, a part of Experian
> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
> Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
> Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 11:10:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:49 GMT