W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

rdf:HTML vs rdf:HTMLLiteral (was: Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June)

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 13:58:31 +0100
Cc: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D20BAAB8-E900-49EE-B554-E798FD747BD7@cyganiak.de>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
On 28 May 2012, at 12:58, Ivan Herman wrote:
> I actually wondered about that: I know the resolution is rdf:HTML; but it may be that, for the sake of consistency, it might be better to call it HMLLiteral.

It's not xsd:stringLiteral or xsd:integerLiteral or rdf:langStringLiteral either.

rdf:XMLLiteral with its pointless verbosity is the odd one out, let's not make that the norm.

Best,
Richard


> 
> (Obviously, this is such a tiny detail...)
> 
> Ivan
> 
> 
>> 
>> Worth noting that N-Triples will be an UTF-8 syntax
>> 
>> Maybe worth noting that one can now escape characters in prefixed names using backslashes: ex:resource\/thing123, ex:thing123\#this. In general, there was an attempt to allow as many characters as possible unescaped in prefixed names (period, colon, digit at start), while allowing the rest in escaped form.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Richard
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave
>>> 
>>> [1]  http://semtechbizsf2012.semanticweb.com/
>>> [2]  http://www.slideshare.net/3roundstones/rdf-wg-update-semtechbiz-2012
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 28 May 2012 12:59:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:49 GMT