W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Making progress on graphs

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:19:37 +0100
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <2C3AE3DD-A4FD-480C-B0D7-7048BA7AAB1B@garlik.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
On 2012-05-18, at 18:35, Andy Seaborne wrote:

>> On modifying N-quads to support empty named graphs, maybe this is the
>> time to make N-quads (or a differently-named simple, line-oriented
>> syntax) be a subset of trig.   Maybe each line is one of:
>> 
>>    <blank line>
>>    # comment
>>    s p o.           - triple in default graph
>>    g { s p o }.     - triple in named graph
>>    g { }.           - empty named graph
> 
> (for the record as no response seems to be taken as agreement)
> 
> I see no point in breaking every existing N-Quads file with a named graph in it.
> 
> http://wiki.dbpedia.org/Downloads37
> 
> My suggestion was:
> 
> _  <http://example/g> .
> 
> to extend existing N-Quads practice IF necessary.
> 
> [I have always found having the graph id last odd but I understand shy it's that way and the original naming was "s p o c" but readability of NQ is not a primary concern.]
> 
> 	Andy

+1 to what Andy says. Emphasis on the IF.

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO
Garlik, a part of Experian
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 10:20:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:49 GMT