W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Making progress on graphs

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:17:48 -0400
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <1337300268.2379.103.camel@waldron>
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 18:34 -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 5/17/12 4:21 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> > So, what should an app developer do, if they want their code to be
> > portable between different sparql engines?
> >
> > (answer: they should avoid using empty named graphs.  right?)
> >
> >      -- Sandro
> circa 2012. There are lots of developers, end-users, power-users already 
> working across SPARQL endpoints without issue. Of all the problems there 
> might be, empty named graphs just isn't one of them :-)

What does that mean?   That there are much bigger problems?   Of course,
but does that really mean we should cause one more?

     -- Sandro
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 00:17:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:49 GMT