On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 18:34 -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 5/17/12 4:21 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > > So, what should an app developer do, if they want their code to be > > portable between different sparql engines? > > > > (answer: they should avoid using empty named graphs. right?) > > > > -- Sandro > circa 2012. There are lots of developers, end-users, power-users already > working across SPARQL endpoints without issue. Of all the problems there > might be, empty named graphs just isn't one of them :-) What does that mean? That there are much bigger problems? Of course, but does that really mean we should cause one more? -- SandroReceived on Friday, 18 May 2012 00:17:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:05 UTC