Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs

Hi Manu,

On 24 May 2012, at 04:45, Manu Sporny wrote:
> The JSON-LD Syntax specification
> normatively references the JSON-LD API specification

I followed the link you provided:
http://json-ld.org/spec/ED/json-ld-syntax/20120522/#references

JSON-LD-API is not a normative reference there.

Best,
Richard



> The first option is problematic because it muddies the clear delineation
> we have now between JSON-LD "the language" and JSON-LD "the API".
> 
> The second option is more reasonable, but requires us to publish the
> JSON-LD API when we are still 3-4 months away from finalizing it. Doing
> this would still be okay since FPWDs don't have to be "complete" by any
> stretch of the imagination.
> 
> Therefore, this is a request that the RDF WG publish both the JSON-LD
> Syntax specification and the JSON-LD API specification as FPWDs.
> 
> The JSON-LD Syntax specification can be found here:
> http://json-ld.org/spec/ED/json-ld-syntax/20120522/
> 
> The JSON-LD API specification can be found here:
> http://json-ld.org/spec/ED/json-ld-api/20120524/
> 
> If any member of the Linked JSON Community Group would like to object to
> this request, please do so before next Wednesday at 11am ET. Keep in
> mind that an objection will result in FPWDs not being considered for
> publication by the RDF WG.
> 
> The RDF WG will re-visit the request next week during the telecon.
> 
> -- manu
> 
> -- 
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched
> http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/
> 

Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 14:51:07 UTC