W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Making progress on graphs

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 22:01:02 -0400
Message-ID: <4FB5AD5E.8080005@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 5/17/12 8:17 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 18:34 -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> On 5/17/12 4:21 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>> So, what should an app developer do, if they want their code to be
>>> portable between different sparql engines?
>>>
>>> (answer: they should avoid using empty named graphs.  right?)
>>>
>>>       -- Sandro
>> circa 2012. There are lots of developers, end-users, power-users already
>> working across SPARQL endpoints without issue. Of all the problems there
>> might be, empty named graphs just isn't one of them :-)
> What does that mean?   That there are much bigger problems?   Of course,
> but does that really mean we should cause one more?
>
>       -- Sandro

My response means: people are writing portable SPARQL that's working 
just fine. Nobody is complaining about SPARQL portability across DBMS 
engines and/or stores right now.
>
>
>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen








Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 02:01:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:49 GMT