W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources”

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 21:21:34 -0400
Message-ID: <4FBC3B9E.3040708@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 5/22/12 8:44 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> But anything can be an RDF resource, and many things can have state, so this is no better than “stateful resource”.
> Well, it still has THAT problem, but it does at least distinguish things that emit RDF from, say, plain old HTML or an embedded JPEG.  (If you want to cover all these bases, then we will need to have another name for the things that emit RDF graph representations, as opposed to all the other resources in the REST architecture.)
>
How about this:
If resource representation is constrained by RDF's data model its an RDF 
resource. In addition, this type or resource like all other Web medium 
resources is a  subClassOf the Web resource.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen








Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 01:22:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:49 GMT