- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 20:32:43 +0100
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Cc: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 9 May 2012, at 19:15, Steve Harris wrote: > I would mention bNode skolemisation / genids - it's a problem that most people dealing with RDF have faced. Makes bNodes useful in the same way that auto_increment columns in SQL are. > > Also Turtle / SPARQL syntax harmonisation is worth mentioning. +1 to both. There's a list of the minor RDF Concepts improvements in the spec — a couple of them are worth mentioning: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#changes Best, Richard > > - Steve > > On 9 May 2012, at 05:36, David Wood wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I will be providing an update the RDF WG's activities and accomplishments at the SemTechBiz conference in San Francisco next month. My slides are officially overdue, so I would like to submit them soon. >> >> Some parts of the talk are obvious (e.g. Turtle and n-triples status), others are decidedly less so (graphs). >> >> Any thoughts on what should be covered and what should be avoided would be appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > Steve Harris, CTO > Garlik, a part of Experian > 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK > +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ > Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 > Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, NG2 Business Park, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, England NG80 1ZZ > >
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 19:33:15 UTC