W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Checking: Turtle grammar / N-Triples Grammar

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 05:38:37 -0400
Message-ID: <4FB3759D.2000704@gmail.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
CC: RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>


On 05/16/2012 05:30 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> In case it helps to get Turtle doc to publication, I did some checking of 
> the 2012-05-16T10:00:00+01:00 Turtle and N-Triples grammars because this is 
> last call.  I also went over Eric's message of 11/May.
>
>     Andy
>
> ==== 3 Corrections

[...]
>
> ==== Presentational
>
> == Turtle
>
[...]
> 2/ After reflecting on yesterdays discussion, and noting the greedy 
> tokenization rule, the (WS)+ are not needed.
>
> '@base' (WS)+
>
> The (WS)+ isn't needed because
>
> @baseprefix:<foo>.
>
> fails because @baseprefix is a LANGTAG.
>
I don't understand what you are getting at here?   You appear to be saying 
that this is not valid syntax, but this seems to indicate that the WS is needed.

[...]

peter
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 09:39:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:49 GMT