W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle

From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 06:49:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPqY83zCV81Ed307=EFVEmFahhq4dZDCqBVDqqGnQfUyfQSR4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, RDF-WG WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 14:08 +0100, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>> On 15 May 2012, at 13:30, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>> >> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name> wrote:
>> >>> 1.1) Change the allowed prefix keyword to include PREFIX (case
>> >>> insensitive) in addition to @prefix (ISSUE-89)
>> >>>
>> >>> 1.2) Change the allowed base keyword to include BASE (case
>> >>> insensitive) in addition to @base (ISSUE-89)
>> >>>
>> >>> 1.3) Remove required trailing period from directives (ISSUE-89)
>> >>
>> >> -1
>> >>
>> >> SPARQL is not Turtle.
>> >
>> > But we did resolve to align them, agreeing, "they should be the same
>> > except for well-motivated (and small) exceptions."
>>
>> The resolution wast that the *triple pattern syntax* should be the same:
>
> True.
>
> My point about Trig still holds.  If Trig follows the spirit of this
> resolution, aligning its statements with SPARQL's "triples pattern
> language" then we have keywords: @prefix, @base, and graph.

TriG never had a keyword for GRAPH at all and doesn't need one. Simply
positional, <graph> { <s> <p> <o> }.

Please see http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/TriG/ and
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/trig/index.html

>
> Is that what you want?
>
>> This shouldn't be understood to include BASE and PREFIX, I think.
>>
>> Best,
>> Richard
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 13:49:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:48 GMT