W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Making progress on graphs

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:17:53 +0100
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <7351806E-CC71-4C9A-BEFD-9794D38A2BF6@garlik.com>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
On 2012-05-17, at 23:34, Kingsley Idehen wrote:

> On 5/17/12 4:21 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>> So, what should an app developer do, if they want their code to be
>> portable between different sparql engines?
>> 
>> (answer: they should avoid using empty named graphs.  right?)
>> 
>>     -- Sandro
> circa 2012. There are lots of developers, end-users, power-users already working across SPARQL endpoints without issue. Of all the problems there might be, empty named graphs just isn't one of them :-)

+1

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO
Garlik, a part of Experian
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 11:18:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:49 GMT