W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

[Turtle] Editorial Issue: Fwd: Please put "N-Triples" in the specification title

From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 08:35:17 -0400
Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
To: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6FB21F38-0CA2-491B-8BBB-31C26F8CECD4@3roundstones.com>
Hi Gavin and Eric,

This seems like a simple editorial issue to me.  It seems to be supported by others in the thread without obvious objection.

Can you please change both the title and the proposed short name (as Andy suggested later in the thread)?  Thanks.

David Wood, Ph.D.
3 Round Stones

Begin forwarded message:

> Resent-From: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
> From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
> Subject: Please put "N-Triples" in the specification title
> Date: May 2, 2012 20:48:18 EDT
> To: public-rdf-comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
> Suggestion: Please put "N-Triples" in the document title of its
> specification (along with "Turtle", since both languages are defined in
> the same specification).  This will make it show up better in search
> results and make it easier for others to find it. After all, N-Triples
> is another language, complete with its own media type, and people will
> look for it as a language, even if it happens to be defined as a subset
> of Turtle.  
> This lack is why I failed to find it when I was looking for it today,
> and instead only found the old spec in the RDF Test Cases specification.
> As present, unless one already knows the spec, one would have no way of
> knowing that the N-Triples definition is deep down in section 12 of the
> Turtle spec.  
> Thanks!
> -- 
> David Booth, Ph.D.
> http://dbooth.org/
> Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
> reflect those of his employer.
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 12:35:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:04 UTC