W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66)

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 22:07:31 -0500
Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6DB9B211-5B47-4080-A91C-62760FCEB839@ihmc.us>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>

On May 1, 2012, at 7:57 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> XSD 1.1 has added a number of new datatypes, and revised some of the existing ones. XSD 1.1 is now a W3C Recommendation. ISSUE-66 asks the question whether to add the new types to the list of XSD types allowed in RDF.
> 
> Alex has previously analysed the changes in XSD 1.1 from an RDF point of view:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Feb/0039.html
> 
> I fully concur with his findings and recommendations, and hence propose:
> 
> 
> PROPOSAL: Resolve ISSUE-66 by adding xsd:duration, xsd:dayTimeDuration, xsd:yearMonthDuration and xsd:dateTimeStamp to the table of allowed XSD types in RDF Concepts ED Section 5.1
> 
> 
> (RDF Semantics has a redundant list of the same types; this also needs to be changed accordingly, or removed in favour of normatively referencing RDF Concepts.)

+1    I am happy to have Semantics refer to Concepts for the list. 

Pat

> 
> Best,
> Richard
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 03:08:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:48 GMT